FAQ | Contact Us | Advertise  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for Health Information Professionals RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Current Issue

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified Health Information Professionals


Your Letters

ACoS Survey Preparation Entails Much More


View Comments (2)Print ArticleEmail Article

Ms. Hulbert may indeed be a certified tumor registrar (CTR), but I very much doubt she has ever been a CTR at a program under survey (Preparing for Your AcoS Survey, April 2009).

Having been through multiple American College of Surgeons/Commission on Cancer (ACoS/CoC) surveys, the first tip-off was her presumption that a registrar waits until the official letter arrives before starting preparations. Wrong.

Any CTR worth her/his salt will tell you we're always gathering information and preparing for the next survey. The reason for all those regularly scheduled (and mandated) cancer committee meetings is to have discussion about the progress on each of the 36 Standards.

Before the first committee meeting of the year, we develop a Cancer Committee Goals and Objectives, a formalized list of what needs to be done and who is to do it; by the final committee meeting of the year, every entry must be accounted for.

At any given time, the CTR should know exactly where the facility stands in regard to each and every one of those Standards. There's no need to develop a separate three-ring binder; keep all the material with the minutes at which it was discussed. Then, when the survey letter does arrive, plug information for the past 3 years into the SAR and send required hard copies to the CoC surveyor and ACoS.

And on the day of survey, there's much more to being a CTR for a CoC accredited cancer program than reserving conference rooms and arranging refreshments. True, those are responsibilities we handle, but we also make certain all players have their schedules and know their scripts, all departments are ready for the visit with relevant documentation at hand, that our abstracting data is ready to be scrutinized, and that numerous ancillary statistical reports are ready and waiting.

Nancy Story, BS, CTR

Via e-mail


 

I completely agree with Nancy and had the same thoughts as I read the article. I understand each Registrar has their own method of doing things, but WOW...that's a lot of busy work! Getting physicians to meet for 2 hours and then weekly is not reality and is un-necessary if you've been preparing all along at Cancer Committee like we all do. It's my understanding that chart review (other than CAP) is not even performed anymore. A peer review process or alternate perspective in the original article would be good.

Sheri Goodwin,  Cancer RegistrarMay 22, 2009
Hannial, MO



Thank you, Nancy Story, for setting the record straight. That article was so off the mark I couldn't believe a CTR wrote it. Advance really needs to have some sort of peer review so such inaccurate articles are not published. I hope no beginner CTR's accept it as truth.

Jan  Marshall ,  Cancer Registry Coordinator,  Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical CenterMay 21, 2009
Chicago , IL




     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

 

Search Jobs

Zip

Go